# ATVM Status Template

Use this as the default ATVM automation run-status template for:
- local status responses in the terminal
- Mattermost status posts after a completed run

## Layout

```md
## ATVM Run Status
### <build_name>

**COVERAGE:**
- template: `<template-name>`
- datastore/config family: `<config family>`
- migration style: `<high-level test style>`
- integration/plugin path: `<integration/plugin>`
- scope of this run: `<batch or run scope>`

**TEST FLOW:**
- <template-specific numbered steps>

**SUMMARY:**

| Metric | Value |
|---|---:|
| finished | <n> |
| passed | <n> |
| failed | <n> |
| skipped | <n> |

**HOSTS:**

| Host | Kernel | Status | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| <host-name> | <kernel-version or unknown> | ✅ PASS | completed |
| <host-name> | <kernel-version or unknown> | ⚠️ FAIL | <useful failure description> |
| <host-name> | <kernel-version or unknown> | ⏳ RUN | in progress |
| <host-name> | <kernel-version or unknown> | ⏭️ SKIP | <skip reason> |

**TIMING:**

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| start | <start time> |
| end | <end time or n/a> |
| total | <total or elapsed runtime> |
| quickest | <host> - <runtime> or n/a |
| longest | <host> - <runtime> or n/a |
| average | <runtime> or n/a |

**NOTES:**
- <note>
- <note>
```

## Rules
- Keep `COVERAGE:`, `TEST FLOW:`, `SUMMARY:`, `HOSTS:`, `TIMING:`, and `NOTES:` in that order.
- Use the title format:
  - `## ATVM Run Status`
  - `### <build_name>`
- Use flat bullet lists for `COVERAGE:` and `TEST FLOW:`.
- Use Markdown tables for `SUMMARY:`, `HOSTS:`, and `TIMING:`.
- Use one host per row in the `HOSTS:` section.
- Include a `Kernel` column immediately after `Host` in the `HOSTS:` table.
- For completed hosts, prefer:
  - `✅ PASS`
  - `⚠️ FAIL`
- For in-progress or skipped hosts, use:
  - `⏳ RUN`
  - `⏭️ SKIP`
- Keep `Detail` concise.
- Put broader context under `NOTES:`, not in the host table.
- `COVERAGE:` should describe what the run was intended to cover without listing target hosts.
- `TEST FLOW:` should describe the template-specific numbered run flow once for the whole test, not per host.
- The watcher resolves `TEST FLOW:` from the run template name.
- `cmc-e2e` currently uses this flow:
  - `1. Verifying set up`
  - `2. Power on and obtain ip address and host name`
  - `3. Uninstall CMC if still exists`
  - `4. Setting up disk`
  - `5. Copy CMC install command from GUI`
  - `6. Install CMC`
  - `7. Create migration session`
  - `8. Tracking Changes`
  - `9. Trigger cmotion and do I/O test before actual cutover`
  - `10. Verify migration remains healthy during I/O activity`
  - `11. Prepare for cutover`
  - `12. Stop application / stop test I/O`
  - `13. Run final sync`
  - `14. Confirm destination is fully up to date`
  - `15. Perform cutover`
  - `16. Validate destination host / disk state`
  - `17. Run post-cutover checks`
  - `18. Power off`
- See `/home/aw/code/cds/atvm/docs/automation/examples.md` for `cmc-e2e` examples.
- Resolve kernel values by cross-referencing hostnames against `/home/aw/code/cds/atvm/inventory/vm-inventory.md`.
- If no kernel value can be verified from `vm-inventory.md`, use `unknown`.
- Use the same template for Mattermost and local operator-visible status output.