Prefer generated specs for ATVM test flow
This commit is contained in:
@@ -274,7 +274,11 @@ Status-report expectations:
|
||||
- If `categorize mode: enabled` is already shown in `COVERAGE:`, do not also repeat `--categorize` under `run options`.
|
||||
- When grouped categorized timing is reconstructed from host reporter artifacts, derive per-host quickest/longest/average durations from the sequence of recovered host timestamps and the grouped end time instead of leaving those metrics as `n/a`.
|
||||
- In `TEST FLOW:`, show the template-specific numbered run flow once for the whole test, not per host.
|
||||
- Resolve the flow from the run template name.
|
||||
- For `TEST FLOW:`, treat the generated host spec from the actual run as the source of truth whenever it exists.
|
||||
- Extract the numbered flow steps from the generated `.ts` spec referenced by that run's `specPattern`.
|
||||
- Do not prefer a static template flow list over a generated spec from the actual run.
|
||||
- Use template-level or static fallback flow only when the generated spec cannot be found or parsed.
|
||||
- If fallback is required, resolve it from the run template name before using any generic default flow.
|
||||
- `cmc-e2e` currently uses the 22-step migration flow documented in `/home/aw/code/cds/atvm/docs/automation/status-template.md`.
|
||||
- `cmc-systemOS` currently uses the 21-step boot-disk migration flow documented in `/home/aw/code/cds/atvm/docs/automation/status-template.md`.
|
||||
- Keep `NOTES:` behavior consistent across template types; do not add template-specific internal-source notes such as parent-log-summary recovery details.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user