Simplify ATVM host detail reporting
This commit is contained in:
@@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ Status-report expectations:
|
||||
- Do not include generic watcher bookkeeping messages in `NOTES:` such as artifact-detection confirmations.
|
||||
- Do not include internal watcher fallback notes in `NOTES:` such as `check-xml-files.ts` validation confirmations or reporter-artifact recovery details.
|
||||
- The `HOSTS:` table includes `Host`, `Kernel`, `Status`, and `Detail` columns in that order.
|
||||
- Do not show total test/failure counts in the `Detail` column. Keep those counts in watcher state and summary logic only.
|
||||
- For passed hosts, render `Detail` as `completed`.
|
||||
- For any failed host, keep the `Detail` column compact by showing the failing step plus a short error summary, not the full raw stack trace.
|
||||
- If richer failure text is available, put the longer trimmed excerpt in `FAILURE NOTES:` so the result stays readable in Mattermost and local status output.
|
||||
- In `COVERAGE:`, describe the important `cmc-templates.py` command inputs such as template, categorize mode, datastore/config family, config filename, migration style, any real plugin/integration path, and other operator-relevant run options, but do not list target hosts there or include verbose prose scope descriptions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -665,3 +665,12 @@ This file stores run-specific examples only when a run produced a new learning r
|
||||
- Action for future runs:
|
||||
- When a run is marked `FAILED` from hang-kill markers or non-zero runner exit and no host results are available, synthesize one failed host row from current host/spec inference.
|
||||
- Use a clear failure detail such as `hang timeout killed runner` so operator-facing status always includes a concrete host failure line.
|
||||
|
||||
## Run Learning: 2026-06-04 (Host detail should not show total test counts)
|
||||
- Observed failure mode:
|
||||
- A passing compute-migration run posted `29 tests, 0 failures` in the `HOSTS` detail column while `TEST FLOW:` listed 30 planned/generated spec steps.
|
||||
- The mismatch was confusing because host detail came from actual Cypress reporter counts, while `TEST FLOW:` came from static generated-spec extraction.
|
||||
- Action for future runs:
|
||||
- Keep raw test/failure counts in watcher state for classification and debugging, but do not render them in the `HOSTS` detail column.
|
||||
- For passing hosts, render detail as `completed`.
|
||||
- For failed hosts, render only the failing step plus compact error summary; put richer excerpts in `FAILURE NOTES:`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user